Beall's List of Questionable Publishers

From Bradwiki
Revision as of 12:46, 16 January 2017 by Bradley Monk (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<html> <h2>LIST OF PUBLISHERS</h2> <p>Last updated JANUARY 2017</p> <div class="entry"> <h2>Beall’s List:</h2> <h3>Potential, possible, or probable predatory schol...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Last updated JANUARY 2017

Beall’s List:

Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers

This is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. We recommend that scholars read the available reviews, assessments and descriptions provided here, and then decide for themselves whether they want to submit articles, serve as editors or on editorial boards.  In a few cases, non-open access publishers whose practices match those of predatory publishers have been added to the list as well. The criteria for determining predatory publishers are <a href="" target="_blank">here</a>.

We hope that tenure and promotion committees can also decide for themselves how importantly or not to rate articles published in these journals in the context of their own institutional standards and/or geocultural locus.  We emphasize that journal publishers and journals change in their business and editorial practices over time. This list is kept up-to-date to the best extent possible but may not reflect sudden, unreported, or unknown enhancements.