Choquet: Difference between revisions

From bradwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 200: Line 200:


<big>The PDZ-Binding Site of GluR2 Controls Its Surface Expression but Not Its Lateral Mobility</big>
<big>The PDZ-Binding Site of GluR2 Controls Its Surface Expression but Not Its Lateral Mobility</big>
* Given the striking role of Stargazin C terminus in controlling AMPAR surface diffusion, we wondered if AMPAR subunits C termini had any role in controlling surface movements. The direct interaction of '''GluR2''' C terminus with the PDZ-containing proteins ABP/GRIP and PICK1 has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of AMPARs expression at synaptic sites.
* Given the striking role of Stargazin C terminus in controlling AMPAR surface diffusion, we wondered if AMPAR subunits C termini had any role in controlling surface movements. The direct interaction of '''GluR2''' C terminus with the PDZ-containing proteins ABP/GRIP and PICK1 has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of AMPARs expression at synaptic sites. Whether these proteins are involved solely in modulating the surface expression of the AMPARs or whether they also anchor surface AMPARs at synapse, however, remains unclear.
* Whether these proteins are involved solely in modulating the surface expression of the AMPARs or whether they also anchor surface AMPARs at synapse, however, remains unclear.
* We first used a mutant '''GluR2''', GluR2-DC, in which the last C-terminal four amino acids corresponding to the PDZ binding site were removed.
* We first used a mutant '''GluR2''', GluR2-DC, in which the last C-terminal four amino acids corresponding to the PDZ binding site were removed.
* We compared the surface expression of '''GluR2''' DC::GFP and wild-type '''GluR2''' in cultured hippocampal neurons. Since the GFP tag is coupled to the extracellular N terminus of '''GluR2''', the surface receptors could be specifically immunolabeled with an anti-GFP. The signal coming from this surface staining was normalized to that of the signal of the GFP, which corresponds to the total intracellular and surface expression of the recombinant protein. <br>'''''Note: Interesting! Never heard of this methodology for determining the proportion of receptors expressed at the membrane vs intracellular'''''
* We compared the surface expression of '''GluR2''' DC::GFP and wild-type '''GluR2''' in cultured hippocampal neurons. Since the GFP tag is coupled to the extracellular N terminus of '''GluR2''', the surface receptors could be specifically immunolabeled with an anti-GFP. The signal coming from this surface staining was normalized to that of the signal of the GFP, which corresponds to the total intracellular and surface expression of the recombinant protein. <br>'''''Note: Interesting! Never heard of this methodology for determining the proportion of receptors expressed at the membrane vs intracellular'''''
Line 207: Line 206:
* GluR2 DC still colocalized with Homer1c so, while GluR2 DC is less expressed at the neuronal membrane, it's still clustered at excitatory synapses.
* GluR2 DC still colocalized with Homer1c so, while GluR2 DC is less expressed at the neuronal membrane, it's still clustered at excitatory synapses.
* To investigate the role of GluR2 PDZ interactors in controlling GluR2 lateral mobility, we tracked in real time the movement of GluR2:WT:GFP or GluR2:DC:GFP at the neuronal surface using QDots coupled to anti-GFP. <br> '''''Note: This thing is a monster... <br>GluR2:DC{{Nc}}GFP{{Nc}}anti-GFP{{Nc}}Qdot  <br>Remember from their 2004 paper, they were already reporting a decrease in diffusion rate, specifically at the synapse, when they compared Qdots and at the synapse compared to a fluorescent marker'''''
* To investigate the role of GluR2 PDZ interactors in controlling GluR2 lateral mobility, we tracked in real time the movement of GluR2:WT:GFP or GluR2:DC:GFP at the neuronal surface using QDots coupled to anti-GFP. <br> '''''Note: This thing is a monster... <br>GluR2:DC{{Nc}}GFP{{Nc}}anti-GFP{{Nc}}Qdot  <br>Remember from their 2004 paper, they were already reporting a decrease in diffusion rate, specifically at the synapse, when they compared Qdots and at the synapse compared to a fluorescent marker'''''
* The diffusing properties of GluR2 were not significantly changed by the deletion of the PDZ binding site. Indeed, the fraction of immobile receptors and the median diffusion coefficients of mobile receptors were similar for GluR2:WT:GFP and GluR2:DC:GFP
* '''diffusion''' of '''GluR2''' were '''not changed''' by the '''deletion''' of the '''PDZ binding site'''. Indeed, the fraction of immobile receptors, percentage time in confined sites, and the median diffusion coefficients of mobile receptors were similar for GluR2:WT:GFP and GluR2:DC:GFP
 





Revision as of 23:28, 9 July 2013

Malinow Molecular Methods Quantum Dots Choquet AMPAR


Study Timeline - PubMed


2003

Tardin, Cognet, Bats, Lounis, Choquet • 2003 • EMBO - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2004

Groc L, Heine M, Cognet L, Brickley K, Stephenson FA, Lounis B, Choquet D. • 2004 • Nature Neuroscience - - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Summary To-Date

2005

Triller, Choquet • 2005 • Trends in Neuroscience - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Thoumine, et-al, Choquet • 2005 • Biophys - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2006

Thoumine, Lambert, Mège, Choquet • 2006 • Journal - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Cognet, Groc, Lounis, Choquet • 2006 • Science STKE - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Lasne, et-al, Choquet, Cognet, Lounis • 2006 • Biophys - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2007

Groc, et-al, Choquet, Cognet • 2007 • J Neuro - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Ehlers, Heine, Groc, Lee, Choquet • 2007 • Neuron - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Saglietti, et-al, Choquet, Sala, Sheng, Passafaro • 2007 • Neuron - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Bats, Groc, Choquet • 2007 • Neuron - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary

2008

Cognet, Lounis, Choquet • 2008 • CHS - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Heine, Groc, Huganir, Cognet, Choquet • 2008 • Science - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Groc, Choquet • 2008 • Mol Membr Biol - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Triller, Choquet • 2008 • Neuron - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2009

Renner, Cognet L, Lounis B, Triller A, Choquet D. • 2009 • Neuropsychopharm - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Renner, Choquet, Triller • 2009 • J Neuro - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Tigaret C, Choquet D. • 2009 • Science - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Frischknecht R, Heine M, Perrais D, Seidenbecher CI, Choquet D, Gundelfinger ED. • 2009 • Nature Neuro - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Petrini EM, Lu J, Cognet L, Lounis B, Ehlers MD, Choquet D. • 2009 • Neuron - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Saint-Michel E, Giannone G, Choquet D, Thoumine O. • 2009 • Biophys J - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2010

Opazo P, Labrecque S, Tigaret CM, Frouin A, Wiseman PW, De Koninck P, Choquet D. • 2010 • Neuron - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Giannone G, Hosy E, Levet F, Constals A, Schulze K, Sobolevsky AI, Rosconi MP, Gouaux E, Tampé R, Choquet D, Cognet L. • 2010 • Biophys - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Brachet A, Leterrier C, Irondelle M, Fache MP, Racine V, Sibarita JB, Choquet D, Dargent B. • 2010 • J Cell Bio - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Bard L, Sainlos M, Bouchet D, Cousins S, Mikasova L, Breillat C, Stephenson FA, Imperiali B, Choquet D, Groc L. • 2010 • PNAS - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2011

Opazo P, Choquet D. • 2011 • Molec Cell Neuro - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Sainlos M, Tigaret C, Poujol C, Olivier NB, Bard L, Breillat C, Thiolon K, Choquet D, Imperiali B. • 2011 • Nature ChemBio - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Grunwald C, Schulze K, Giannone G, Cognet L, Lounis B, Choquet D, Tampé R. • 2011 • J Am Chem - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Mondin M, Labrousse V, Hosy E, Heine M, Tessier B, Levet F, Poujol C, Blanchet C, Choquet D, Thoumine O. • 2011 • J Neuro - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2012

Czöndör, Mondin, Garcia, Heine, Frischknecht, Choquet, Sibarita, Thoumine • 2012 • PNAS - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Izeddin I, Boulanger J, Racine V, Specht CG, Kechkar A, Nair D, Triller A, Choquet D, Dahan M, Sibarita JB. • 2012 • Opt Express - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Opazo P, Sainlos M, Choquet D. • 2012 • Curr Opin Neurobio - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Hoze N, Nair D, Hosy E, Sieben C, Manley S, Herrmann A, Sibarita JB, Choquet D, Holcman D. • 2012 • PNAS - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


2013

Giannone G, Hosy E, Sibarita JB, Choquet D, Cognet L. • 2013 • Methods Molec Bio - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Carta M, Opazo P, Veran J, Athané A, Choquet D, Coussen F, Mulle C. • 2013 • EMBO - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Sainlos M, Iskenderian-Epps WS, Olivier NB, Choquet D, Imperiali B. • 2013 • J Am Chem - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Kechkar A, Nair D, Heilemann M, Choquet D, Sibarita JB. • 2013 • PLoS One - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary


Giannone G, Mondin M, Grillo-Bosch D, Tessier B, Saint-Michel E, Czöndör K, Sainlos M, Choquet D, Thoumine O. • 2013 • Cell Rep - PDF

Expand to view experiment summary





{{Article|Author|Year|Journal - [http://bradleymonk.com/media/Choquet1.pdf PDF]|15749166|Title}}