File:Bourne Harris 2012 F4.png: Difference between revisions
Bradley Monk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bradley Monk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article|Bourne & Harris |2012| | <br> | ||
{{Article|Bourne & Harris |2012|Curr Opin Neurobiol • [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438811001851 PDF]|22088391|Nanoscale analysis of structural synaptic plasticity}} | |||
Dramatic structural synaptic scaling revealed by ssEM following induction of LTP by TBS in the mature hippocampus. (a) EM and (ai) reconstruction of a small thin spine (category T, head diameter <0.45 mm). (b) EM and (bi) reconstruction of a medium thin spine (category T, head diameter >0.45 mm but <0.6 mm). (c) EM and (ci) reconstruction of a mushroom spine (M, head diameter >0.6 mm). (d) Small thin spines were significantly reduced in number (P < 0.05) while (e) PSDs on all remaining spines were significantly enlarged (**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05). (f) Reconstructions of control and LTP dendrites demonstrate equal summed PSD area per micron length of dendrite, despite large differences in their average synapse size and density. Scale cube = 0.5 mm on a side. (g) Average summed PSD area per micron length of dendrite is the same for dendrites across all times in the control and TBS-LTP conditions.Adapted from Bourne and Harris [4]. | Dramatic structural synaptic scaling revealed by ssEM following induction of LTP by TBS in the mature hippocampus. (a) EM and (ai) reconstruction of a small thin spine (category T, head diameter <0.45 mm). (b) EM and (bi) reconstruction of a medium thin spine (category T, head diameter >0.45 mm but <0.6 mm). (c) EM and (ci) reconstruction of a mushroom spine (M, head diameter >0.6 mm). (d) Small thin spines were significantly reduced in number (P < 0.05) while (e) PSDs on all remaining spines were significantly enlarged (**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05). (f) Reconstructions of control and LTP dendrites demonstrate equal summed PSD area per micron length of dendrite, despite large differences in their average synapse size and density. Scale cube = 0.5 mm on a side. (g) Average summed PSD area per micron length of dendrite is the same for dendrites across all times in the control and TBS-LTP conditions.Adapted from Bourne and Harris [4]. | ||
[[Category:Journals]] | [[Category:Journals]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:38, 2 January 2015
Bourne & Harris • 2012 • Curr Opin Neurobiol • PDF
Dramatic structural synaptic scaling revealed by ssEM following induction of LTP by TBS in the mature hippocampus. (a) EM and (ai) reconstruction of a small thin spine (category T, head diameter <0.45 mm). (b) EM and (bi) reconstruction of a medium thin spine (category T, head diameter >0.45 mm but <0.6 mm). (c) EM and (ci) reconstruction of a mushroom spine (M, head diameter >0.6 mm). (d) Small thin spines were significantly reduced in number (P < 0.05) while (e) PSDs on all remaining spines were significantly enlarged (**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05). (f) Reconstructions of control and LTP dendrites demonstrate equal summed PSD area per micron length of dendrite, despite large differences in their average synapse size and density. Scale cube = 0.5 mm on a side. (g) Average summed PSD area per micron length of dendrite is the same for dendrites across all times in the control and TBS-LTP conditions.Adapted from Bourne and Harris [4].
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 15:30, 2 January 2015 | Error creating thumbnail: File missing | 630 × 674 (181 KB) | Bradley Monk (talk | contribs) | Dramatic structural synaptic scaling revealed by ssEM following induction of LTP by TBS in the mature hippocampus. (a) EM and (ai) reconstruction of a small thin spine (category T, head diameter <0.45 mm). (b) EM and (bi) reconstruction of a medium thi... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.
