Brad: Difference between revisions

From bradwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:
{{Article|Ehlers, Heine, Groc, Lee, Choquet|2007|Neuron - [http://bradleymonk.com/media/Choquet2007B.pdf PDF]|17481397|Diffusional trapping of GluR1 AMPA receptors by input-specific synaptic activity}}
{{Article|Ehlers, Heine, Groc, Lee, Choquet|2007|Neuron - [http://bradleymonk.com/media/Choquet2007B.pdf PDF]|17481397|Diffusional trapping of GluR1 AMPA receptors by input-specific synaptic activity}}


 
;Silenced synapses (compared to active synapses)
;silenced synapses (compared to active synapses)
* {{Dn}} (50%) GluR1
* {{Dn}} (50%) GluR1
* {{Nc}} PSD-95  
* {{Nc}} PSD-95  
Line 69: Line 68:
* {{Nc}} presynaptic bassoon  
* {{Nc}} presynaptic bassoon  
* {{Nc}} puncta size of PSD-95 Shank bassoon  
* {{Nc}} puncta size of PSD-95 Shank bassoon  


;GluR1 QDots diffusion rate
;GluR1 QDots diffusion rate
Line 74: Line 74:
* medium - inactivated synapses
* medium - inactivated synapses
* low - active synapses
* low - active synapses


;GluR1 QDots features
;GluR1 QDots features
Line 81: Line 82:
* often (76.1%) exited inactive synapse (60 s period)
* often (76.1%) exited inactive synapse (60 s period)
* rarely (21.4%) exited active synapse (60 s period)
* rarely (21.4%) exited active synapse (60 s period)


;GluR1 QDots diffusion rate after synaptic reversal  
;GluR1 QDots diffusion rate after synaptic reversal  
Line 89: Line 91:
[[File:Choquet2007B1.png|thumb|left|400px|
[[File:Choquet2007B1.png|thumb|left|400px|
<b>Confinement of GluR1 in synapses</b><br>
<b>Confinement of GluR1 in synapses</b><br>
* more confined at active vs inactive synapses
* more confined at active synapses
]]
]]



Revision as of 20:20, 9 July 2013

Malinow Molecular Methods Quantum Dots Choquet AMPAR


Study Timeline - PubMed



Summary

2003 Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses


Tardin, Cognet, Bats, Lounis, Choquet • 2003 • EMBO - PDF

Tested effects of glutamate and calcium influx on GluR2 diffusion.
  • Anti-GluR2 antibodies labeled with Cy5 or Alexa-647


Glutamate (100 uM) effect on GluR2
  • diffusion rate
  • (85%) endocytosis (within 15 min)
  • (55%) diffusion within synapses
  • diffusion rate non-synaptic
  • (30%) completely immobile receptors


Calcium (induced) influx effect
  • (%) mobile GluR2
  • (59%) GluR2 membrane expression


Calcium blocking (BAPTA) effect
  • (%) mobile GluR2


2004 Differential activity-dependent regulation of the lateral mobilities of AMPA and NMDA receptors


Groc L, Heine M, Cognet L, Brickley K, Stephenson FA, Lounis B, Choquet D. • 2004 • Nature Neuroscience - - PDF

GluR2 vs. NMDAR-(NR1) diffusion
  • extrasynaptic: GluR2 > NMDAR (4x)
  • synaptic: GluR2 NMDAR
  • synaptic > extrasynaptic (2x ??)
KCl Neural Stimulation
  • (5x) extrasynaptic diffusion rate GluR2
  • (%) synaptic diffusion rate GluR2
PKC activity (stim by TPA)
  • extrasynaptic diffusion rate GluR2 & NMDAR
  • synaptic diffusion rate GluR2 & NMDAR
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
* TTX - block neural activity
* KCl - envoke neural activity
* TPA - stimulate PKC


2007 Diffusional trapping of GluR1 AMPA receptors by input-specific synaptic activity


Ehlers, Heine, Groc, Lee, Choquet • 2007 • Neuron - PDF

Silenced synapses (compared to active synapses)
  • (50%) GluR1
  • PSD-95
  • presynaptic VGLUT1
  • presynaptic bassoon
  • puncta size of PSD-95 Shank bassoon


GluR1 QDots diffusion rate
  • high - extrasynaptic
  • medium - inactivated synapses
  • low - active synapses


GluR1 QDots features
  • often passed through silenced synapses
  • often moved from silenced to active synapse
  • rarely (2 of 1700) moved from active to silenced synapse
  • often (76.1%) exited inactive synapse (60 s period)
  • rarely (21.4%) exited active synapse (60 s period)


GluR1 QDots diffusion rate after synaptic reversal
  • at previously active synapses
  • at previously silenced synapses


Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Confinement of GluR1 in synapses
* more confined at active synapses



2007 Interaction between Stargazin and PSD-95 Regulates AMPA Receptor Surface Trafficking


Notes
  • Quantum Dot
  • FRAP
  • Live hippocampal neurons
  • exchange of AMPAR by lateral diffusion between extrasynaptic and synaptic sites mostly depends on the interaction of Stargazin with PSD-95 and not upon the GluR2 AMPAR subunit C terminus.
  • Disruption of interactions between Stargazin and PSD-95 strongly increases AMPAR surface diffusion, preventing AMPAR accumulation at postsynaptic sites.
  • AMPARs and Stargazin diffuse as complexes in and out synapses.






{{Article|Author|Year|Journal - [http://bradleymonk.com/media/Choquet1.pdf PDF]|15749166|Title}}