Nicoll: Difference between revisions
Bradley Monk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bradley Monk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<big><big>[http://profiles.ucsf.edu/roger.nicoll Roger Nicoll UCSF Profile]</big></big> | <big><big>[http://profiles.ucsf.edu/roger.nicoll Roger Nicoll UCSF Profile]</big></big> | ||
{{Article|Lu | {{Article|Lu, Gray, Granger, During, Nicoll|2011|J Neurophysiol - [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20980546 PDF]|20980546|Potentiation of synaptic AMPA receptors induced by the deletion of NMDA receptors requires the GluA2 subunit}} | ||
{{ExpandBox|expand to view study notes| | {{ExpandBox|expand to view study notes| | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Malinow]] |
Revision as of 19:24, 15 July 2013
Lu, Gray, Granger, During, Nicoll • 2011 • J Neurophysiol - PDF
expand to view study notes
We thus tested whether GluA2 is required for the potentiation of AMPAR EPSCs following the loss of NMDARs. In the GRIA2fl/fl mice, deleting GluA2 caused about a 50% reduction in the AMPAR EPSC (Fig. 3A ) with no change in the glutamate-evoked AMPAR-mediated outside-out patch currents (B ). Interestingly, in GRIA2fl/flGRIN1fl/fl mice the loss of NMDARs failed to enhance AMPAR EPSCs. In fact, there was a significant further decrease (Fig. 3A ). Neither genetic manipulation changes the PPR. In addition, as expected, deletion of GluA2 caused strong inward rectification. Finally, no difference was found in glutamate evoked AMPAR-mediated currents in outside-out patches (Fig. 3B ). Therefore in contrast to GluA1, the GluA2 subunit is critical for synaptic potentiation of AMPARs following NMDAR deletion.