Nicoll: Difference between revisions

From bradwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
{{ExpandBox|expand to view study notes|
{{ExpandBox|expand to view study notes|


We thus tested whether GluA2 is required for the potentiation of AMPAR EPSCs following the loss of NMDARs. In the GRIA2fl/fl  mice, deleting GluA2 caused about a 50% reduction in the AMPAR EPSC (Fig. 3A ) with no change in the glutamate-evoked AMPAR-mediated outside-out patch currents (B ). Interestingly, in GRIA2fl/flGRIN1fl/fl  mice the loss of NMDARs failed to enhance AMPAR EPSCs. In fact, there was a significant further decrease {{Fig| [[File:Nicoll2011 Fig1.png]] }}. Neither genetic manipulation changes the PPR. In addition, as expected, deletion of GluA2  caused strong inward rectification. Finally, no difference was found in glutamate evoked AMPAR-mediated currents in outside-out patches {{Fig| [[File:Nicoll2011 Fig1.png]] }}. Therefore in contrast to GluA1, the GluA2 subunit is critical for synaptic potentiation of AMPARs following NMDAR deletion.
We thus tested whether GluA2 is required for the potentiation of AMPAR EPSCs following the loss of NMDARs. In the GRIA2fl/fl  mice, deleting GluA2 caused about a 50% reduction in the AMPAR EPSC {{Fig| [[File:Nicoll2011 Fig1.png]] }} with no change in the glutamate-evoked AMPAR-mediated outside-out patch currents (B ). Interestingly, in GRIA2fl/flGRIN1fl/fl  mice the loss of NMDARs failed to enhance AMPAR EPSCs. In fact, there was a significant further decrease {{Fig| [[File:Nicoll2011 Fig1.png]] }}. Neither genetic manipulation changes the PPR. In addition, as expected, deletion of GluA2  caused strong inward rectification. Finally, no difference was found in glutamate evoked AMPAR-mediated currents in outside-out patches {{Fig| [[File:Nicoll2011 Fig1.png]] }}. Therefore in contrast to GluA1, the GluA2 subunit is critical for synaptic potentiation of AMPARs following NMDAR deletion.





Revision as of 23:16, 15 July 2013

Roger Nicoll UCSF Profile

Lu, Gray, Granger, During, Nicoll • 2011 • J Neurophysiol - PDF

expand to view study notes



We thus tested whether GluA2 is required for the potentiation of AMPAR EPSCs following the loss of NMDARs. In the GRIA2fl/fl mice, deleting GluA2 caused about a 50% reduction in the AMPAR EPSC FIG: {{#info: {{{2}}} CLICK AWAY FROM IMAGE TO CLOSE }} with no change in the glutamate-evoked AMPAR-mediated outside-out patch currents (B ). Interestingly, in GRIA2fl/flGRIN1fl/fl mice the loss of NMDARs failed to enhance AMPAR EPSCs. In fact, there was a significant further decrease FIG: {{#info: {{{2}}} CLICK AWAY FROM IMAGE TO CLOSE }}. Neither genetic manipulation changes the PPR. In addition, as expected, deletion of GluA2 caused strong inward rectification. Finally, no difference was found in glutamate evoked AMPAR-mediated currents in outside-out patches FIG: {{#info: {{{2}}} CLICK AWAY FROM IMAGE TO CLOSE }}. Therefore in contrast to GluA1, the GluA2 subunit is critical for synaptic potentiation of AMPARs following NMDAR deletion.